Who is Jack Holland?

News, Commentaries & Political Discussions on USA

Moderator: Club Operations

Who is Jack Holland?

Postby Ahreeman X » Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:35 am

Who is Jack Holland?
The Eccentric American Author

Jack Holland is an American author, researcher, writer and scholar. We have our differences on politics, social sciences and philosophy; however, we have many common grounds. If you try to find Jack Holland, good luck because he is deep in the dungeons of American Intellectual Underground, well hidden from the light and the Big Government which is snooping around in people’s affairs. Jack Holland is practically off the radar but sometimes he appears in Texas!

We would be lucky if we had more like Jack Holland amongst our American Intellectuals. Jack Holland is a scholar and a gentleman. He is a true American Patriot.

More information about Jack Holland:

Interview with Ahreeman X
http://iranpoliticsclub.net/club/viewto ... 299fe#7550

The Last American Newspaper

Jack Holland Books
http://www.amazon.com/Jack-Holland/e/B0 ... r_dp_pel_1
Watcher in the woods
User avatar
Ahreeman X
General 5 Star
General 5 Star
Posts: 1414
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 1:54 pm
Location: San Diego, CA, USA

Postby Ahreeman X » Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:45 am

The following is a piece from a chapter of the Jack Holland’s upcoming book on the Middle East:

President Obama, Ambassador Limbert
and the Politics of Appeasement

On the previous page I quoted from a book written by former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Iran in the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, Dr. John Limbert. One might be inclined to assume a diplomat his credentials would have had a readymade solution to Iran’s problems that would be acceptable to all parties involved in the current crisis. This however does not appear to be the case. Within the Persian community, there are a wide range of views on Iranian politics and many of them are unknown to the broader American public due to mainstream U.S. media censorship, and IRI (Islamic Republic of Iran) propaganda.

One of the most dominant views of the Persian people living in the United States is that the Islamic regime must go as they are an anathema to democracy. On this point I whole-heartedly agree; I however do not agree to wholesale slaughter just because I disagree with one’s point of view. In my book, any religious regime is an anathema to democracy whether that is one run by a slate of Islamic mullahs or a congress of Southern Baptist zealots.

Here in Texas, we have on occasion been exposed to the extreme views of some members of the religious right. It is amazing how many Bible-thumping Baptist politicians here in Texas preach the Gospel of Jesus to their Sunday school classes, preach the Gospel of family values to the masses up in Austin, and then come deer hunting season, head for the nearest whore house south of the border to preach the Gospel of free love while sowing the seed of man so to speak, while forgetting all about their betrothed, beloved, and now betrayed back home. And while the good Texas men-folk are trollamollandering for trollops and white tail, the little wifey whom hubby believes to be that same straight-laced cheer-leading Suzy-homemaker that he married the day they graduated from high school is in fact taking advantage of hubby being gone deer hunting and is pleasuring ole Jose, the Mexican gardener in the pool house in the afternoons, and exploring her wild-side with hubby’s best friends over at the downtown Marriott Hotel bar in the evenings.

Texas Baptists are some of the most hypocritical religious zealots ever to walk the planet earth. If you ever visit the State House up in Austin on Congress Avenue, you may wish to take a spray bottle of Lysol with you. No telling what has passed though the hands of some of those politicians. The foul smell of seedy back room pandering permeates the joint.

Hypocrisy in politics is nothing new though, and the same goes for international politics and the same goes for the politics of the Middle East and the Near East where a media propaganda battle is being played out in United States in order to sway U.S. policy, U.S. politicians, and the U.S. people to one particular viewpoint or another. American politicians have a bad habit of attempting to find a “consensus” view or come up with a middle of the road solution they believe will appease everybody. There are times when appeasing everybody is not a good thing. This is the stupidity embedded in the politically correct ideology of both liberals and conservatives that play the game of big money politics. Conservatives have no more right to harp on political correctness when stuffing their pockets full of greenbacks than do liberals. The real answers only come from facing reality head on and dealing with issues in a just manner. One cannot claim to stand for Women’s Issues and an Islamic Fundamentalist Regime at the same time.

I personally do not believe in the United States interfering in the politics of other nations. But I also do not believe in starting something and then not finishing it, and then abandoning our allies to murder by oppressor. We have let so many good people down around the globe that our reputation as a nation has suffered because of it. In 1978 when the student movement swept through Iran, no one could be sure of the outcome until the outcome became apparent. When a regime, whether it be the regime of a Shah or the regime of a Religious Zealot must execute members of the opposition in order to maintain or come to power, it is a clear sign that the power or the regime in charge is illegitimate. The Shah of Iran had people executed, so did Ayatollah Sayyed Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini when he took over.

Iran needs to be free from both legacies in my view, but again, I am not Persian and am not the one that has to live with the result of whatever form of leadership the nation ultimately chooses. I can only state that I do not want my tax dollars being spent foolishly for political expediency and quick political fixes that perpetuate the results of our past mistakes. I also do not want the United States waging war on behalf of this group or that group in order to appease a wide range of views between of world citizenry. And I do not wish the United States to be the host of proxy wars between the dissatisfied parties. Go somewhere else if you want to kill each other off.

There is way too much collateral damage in war. Smart bombs don’t have a high enough IQ to keep them from going astray and stray bombs are ultimately policy killers and democracy killers. What good is it to bomb the Ayatollahs back to the Stone Age if we bomb thousands of innocent people in the process, therefore creating a new problem and a new group of American-hating fanatics?

The problem we Americans face today in our foreign policy is a direct result of the short-sighted policies and kow-towing of previous administrations, such as Truman did when he bowed to the demands of the Zionists and allowed the racist state of Israel to become a nation, or when we kow-towed to Britain and joined in their Coup d’état of President Mossaddegh. We bear much of the responsibility for the mess the Middle East now finds itself in. Thus we bear the responsibility of helping to fix the problem. But this cannot be accomplished if we continue to look at every problem in the region through an Israeli lense, or an anti-Islamic lense. Not all Baptists are wacko bible-thumpers and not all Islamists are terrorist misogynists. And not all Persians will agree with my views, but they will most certainly agree with me that we are not looking at this problem through a Persian lense as it should be.

While we are the subject of culture, I will also state that I don’t like it when folks come to America and take from its bounty, enjoy its freedom and then return home and bash it or attempt live here and mold it into some mini-version of wherever it is they came from. If you want to move to America, then prepare to become an American, dress like an American, and live like an American—to hell with Chinatowns, Korean towns, and mini-Mexicos. Liberals can stick their multi-culturalism up arces. That doesn’t mean I won’t respect an individual and be willing to learn about their background and culture. What it means is I don’t want special rules being set out in our law books or special privileges being granted in our schools for this culture or that culture. If you want to cover your face with hijab, go back to your own country and do so.

The worst offenders of this kind of nonsense were the American Jews in early part of the 20th Century. Many Americans don’t know this because most simply don’t take the time to delve into our nations’ real history. Henry Ford wrote a great article on this subject matter in the Dearborn Press entitled How the Jews Use Power. In this article there is a sub-section entitled attacks on Christianity. Most American Christians today do not realize that the same two-faced Jews that are attempting to sway Christians to join them in pre-meditated Holy-land Worship, have been stabbing them in the backs for years. Let’s take a look at the facts that Henry Ford disclosed to the American people back in 1923:

[Beginning of Henry Ford Transcript]

Previous to the formation of the Kehillah and the Jewish Committee, this sort of attack on the rights of Americans was sporadic, but since 1906 it has increased in number and insistence. Under cover of the ideal of Liberty we have given the Jews liberty to attack Liberty. What America has been tolerating is intolerance itself. Let us look rapidly down the years and see one phase of that attack. It is the attack upon Christianity. Here are a few items from the record. They are recorded over a period of years following the rise of Jewish power in America:

• 1899-1900. The Jews attempt to have the word "Christian" removed from the Bill of Rights of the State of Virginia.

• 1906-1907. The Jews of Oklahoma petition the Constitutional Convention protesting that the acknowledgment of Christ in the new State constitution then being formulated would be repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.

• The Jews force "The Merchant of Venice" to be dropped from public schools in Texas, Ohio.

• 1907-1908. Widespread demand by the Jews for the complete secularization of the public institutions of this country, as a part of the demand of the Jews for their constitutional rights.

• Supreme Court Justice Brewer's statement that this is a Christian country widely controverted by Jewish rabbis and publications.

• Jews agitate in many cities against Bible reading. Christmas celebrations or carols in Philadelphia, Cincinnati, St. Paul and New York met with strong Jewish opposition.

• 1908-1909. Protests made to Governor of Arkansas against "Christological expressions" employed by him in his Thanksgiving Day proclamation.

• Professor Gotthard Deutsch protests against "Christological prayers" at the high school graduating exercises at Cincinnati.

• Jewish community in Tamaqua, Pennsylvania defeats resolutions providing daily Bible reading in schools.

• Local Council of Jewish Women of Baltimore petitions school board to prohibit Christmas exercises.

• Boycotts were instituted in New York against merchants who opened on Saturday.

• Special efforts at this period to introduce the idea of the Jewish Sabbath into public business. Jews refused to sit as jurors in court, thus postponing cases.

• 1909-1910. On demand of the Jews, the school board of Bridgeport, Pennsylvania, votes to discontinue the recitation of the Lord's Prayer in the school.

• In Newark, New Jersey, the rabbis ask the night schools to discontinue Friday evening sessions, because the Jewish Sabbath begins at sundown on Friday.

• The work of introducing the idea of Jewish national holidays into public life especially active.

• 1910-1911. An attempt to have Hebrew officially recognized was frustrated by Supreme Court Judge Goff.

• Chicago Jews have election date changed because the official date fell on the last day of the Passover.

• Jews oppose Bible reading and singing of hymns in Detroit schools.

• Rabbis force Hartford, Connecticut, school board to drop "The Merchant of Venice" from reading list.

• New York Kehillah does two contradictory things; favors bill to permit Jews to do all kinds of business on Sunday, and pledges itself to co-operate in the strict enforcement of the Sunday laws.

• 1911-1912. Jews in Passaic, New Jersey, petition school board to eliminate Bible reading and all Christian songs from the schools.

• At request of a rabbi, three principals of Roxbury, Mass., public schools agree to banish Christmas tree and omit all references to the season from their schools.

• A Jewish delegate to the Ohio Constitutional Convention suggests that the Constitution be made to forbid Christian religious references in schools.

• The Council of the University Settlement, at the request of the New York Kehillah, adopts this resolution: "That in the holiday celebrations held annually by the Kindergarten Association at the University Settlement every feature of any sectarian character, including Christmas trees, Christmas programs and Christmas songs, shall be eliminated."

• 1912-1913. Jews at Jackson, Tennessee, seek an injunction to prevent the reading of the Bible in City schools.

• Annual Convention Independent Order B'nai B'rith at Nashville, Tennessee, adopts resolution against reading of the Bible and singing Christian songs in public schools.

• Chicago Board of Education, scene of much Jewish agitation, approves recommendation of sub-committee to remove Christmas from the list of official public holidays in schools.

• 1913-1914. The energies of the Jewish powers were concentrated on the task of preventing the United States from changing the immigration laws in a manner to protect the country from undesirable aliens.

• 1914-1915. More Kehillah attempts to secure modification of the Sunday laws.

• 1915-1916. Jewish opposition to various movements towards making the schools free to use the Bible.

• 1916-1917. Jews busy carrying out an immense campaign against the "literacy clause" of the Immigration Bill.

• On demand of the Jews the New Haven Connecticut, Board of Education prevents the reading of "The Merchant of Venice," and extends the prohibition to "Lamb's Tales from Shakespeare."

• 1918-1919. Provost Marshal Crowder, in charge of the Selective Draft U.S. Forces, had issued an order to all medical examiners, under direction of the Surgeon General, stating "The foreign-born, especially Jews, are more apt to malinger than the native-born." Louis Marshall, head of the American Jewish Committee, telegraphed demanding that the "further use of this form shall be at once discontinued." President Wilson ordered the excision of the paragraph.

• The United States Shipping Board sent an advertisement to the "New York Times," calling for a file clerk and stating that a "Christian" was preferred - by which is meant always a non-Jew - the paper rejected it. Louis Marshall again went into action and protested to Bainbridge Colby, Woodrow Wilson's Secretary of State, demanding "Not because of any desire for inflicting punishment, but for the sake of example and the establishment of a necessary precedent this offense should be followed by a dismissal from the public office of the offender, and the public should be informed the reason."

• Attention is called to the tone which the American Jewish Committee adopts when addressing high American officials in the name of Jewry. It is not to be duplicated in the addresses of any other representative of any other race or faith.

• The Plattsburg Manual, published for officers in the United States officers' training camps, contained the statement that "the ideal officer is a Christian gentleman." The A J.C. at once protested against "Christological manifestations," and the Manual was changed to read "the ideal officer is a courteous gentleman."

• The Anti-Defamation Committee claimed that 160 American cities had excluded "The Merchant of Venice" from the public schools.

• 1919-1920. The Kehillah was so successful in its campaign that it was possible for a Jewish advertiser in New York to say that he wanted only Jewish help, but it was not possible for a non-Jewish advertiser to
state his non-Jewish preference.

And so it goes on, year after year, right up to the present day. The incidents quoted are typical not occasional. They represent what is transpiring all the time in the United States as the Jews pursue their "rights." There is no interference with Jewish ways and manners. The Jew may use his own calendar, keep his own days, observe his own form of worship, live in his own ghetto, exist on a dietary principle all his own, slaughter his cattle in a manner which no one who knows about it can approve - he can do all these things without molestation, without the slightest question of his right in them. But, the non-Jew is the "persecuted one." He must do everything the way the Jew wants it done; if not he is infringing on Jewish "rights."

• [ http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/ij_ch7.htm ]

[End of Henry Ford Transcript]

And today, the Jews involved American public education are shoving multiculturalism down our throats and in our public schools, yet one would be hard pressed to find a student of Jewish origin in a public school.

It is my opinion that unless you attended public schools and have your kids in public schools, you should keep the hell out the business of public schools. Read into the backgrounds of most of the “big names” being worshipped in the U.S. public school reform movement and one will find they are of Jewish ancestry. What gives? Do Jew really have all the answers?

What the Kehillah was doing for the Jews at the turn of the century, the ACLU, Southern Poverty Law Center, and World Jewish Congress is doing for them now. Here is the history of the Jewish Kehillah as Henry Ford presented it in 1921:

[Beginning of Henry Ford Transcript]


Two organizations, both of which are as notable for their concealment as for their power, are the New York Kehillah and the American Jewish Committee. The Kehillah is the most potent factor in the political life of New York; it is the organization which today wields so large an influence on the rest of the world, which consciously issues a program which on one side is pro-Jewish and on the other anti-Gentile. It is the central group, the inner government, whose ruling is law and whose act is the official expression of Jewish purpose. It offers a real and complete instance of a government within a government in the midst of America's largest and politically most powerful city, and it also constitutes the machine through which pro-Jewish and anti-Gentile propaganda is operated and Jewish pressure brought to bear against certain American ideas. That is to say, the Jewish government of New York constitutes the essential part of the Jewish Government of the United States.

The word "Kehillah" has the same meaning as "Kahal," which signifies "community," "assembly" or government. It represents the Jewish form of Government in dispersion. In the Babylonian captivity, in Eastern Europe today, the Kahal is the power and protectorate to which the faithful Jew looks for government and justice. The New York Kehillah is the largest and most powerful union of Jews in the world, the center of Jewish world power has been transferred to that city. That is the meaning of the heavy migration of Jews all over the world toward New York in recent decades. It is to them what Rome is to the Catholic and what Mecca is to the Moslem.

The Kehillah is a perfect answer to the deceptive statement that the Jews are so divided among themselves as to render a concert of action impossible. That is one of the statements made for Gentile consumption. All experience shows, even to the most casual observer of Jewish activities, that the capitalist and the bolshevik, the rabbi and the union leader are all united under the flag of Judah. Touch the conservative capitalist who is a Jew, and the red communist who is also a Jew will spring to his defense. It may be that sometimes they love each other less, but altogether they hate the non-Jew more, and that is their common bond. The Kehillah is an alliance, more offensive than defensive, against the "Gentiles."

It is a strange and impressive spectacle which the Kehillah presents, of a people of one racial origin, with a vivid belief in itself and its future, disregarding internal differences, to combine privately in a powerful organization for the racial, material and religious advancement of its own race, to the exclusion of all others.

The American Jewish Committee came into being in 1906. There had been a government investigation into the "White Slave Traffic," the result of which was a direct set of public opinion into channels uncomplimentary to the Jews, and a defensive movement was begun. The Kehillah organized protests against the statement by General Bingham, then police commissioner of the City of New York, that 50 per cent of the crime in the metropolis was committed by Jews. Very soon afterward, General Bingham disappeared from public life, and a national magazine of power and influence which had embarked on a series of articles setting forth the government's finding in the White Slave investigation was forced to discontinue after printing the first article.

The Kehillah has mapped out New York just as the American Jewish Committee has mapped the United States, and practically every Jew belongs to one or more lodges, secret societies, unions, orders, committees and federations. The list is a prodigious one. The purposes interlace and the methods dovetail in such a manner as to bring every phase of American life not only under the watchful eye, but under the swift and powerful action of experienced compulsion upon public affairs.

At the meeting which organized the Kehillah a number of sentiments were expressed which are worthy of consideration today, Judah L. Magnes, then rabbi of Temple Emanu-el, chairman of the meeting, set forth the plan:

"A central organization like that of the Jewish community of New York City is necessary to create a Jewish public opinion," he said.

Rabbi Asher was loudly applauded when he said:

"American interests are one, Jewish interests are another thing."

The delegates at the first open meeting in 1906 represented 222 Jewish societies - religious, political, industrial and communal. Just over a year later the number of Jewish organizations under the jurisdiction of the Kehillah aggregated 688, and in 1921 well over 1,000. When the aggressive program of the Kehillah to make New York a Jewish city, and through New York to make the United States a Jewish country, was announced some of the more conservative Jews of New York were timorous. They did not expect that the American people would stand for it. They thought the American people would immediately understand what was afoot and oppose it. There were others who doubted whether the same Kehillah authority could here be wielded over the Jews as was wielded in the old country ghettos. An official of the Kehillah wrote:

"There were those who doubted the ultimate success of this new venture in Jewish organization. They based their lack of belief on the fact that no governmental authority could possibly be secured; in other words, that the Kehillah of New York could not hope to wield the same power, based on governmental coercion, as the Kehillahs of the Old World."

There is much in this paragraph to indicate the status of the Kehillah in Jewish life. Add to this fact that all the Jews who entered America lived under the Kehillahs of the old world, whose power was based on coercion, and the situation is simple. Regimentation, the destruction of individual liberty which has risen to curse the world, is the basic principle of Jewish government of the Jews, by the Jews.

What else can happen when world government of the Gentiles by the Jews for the bankers becomes established?

However, the misgivings of some Jews were not justified. The Americans made no protest. The Kehillah went ahead with its campaign and America submitted. New York became Jewish. American life, American thought, and American politics, became Jewish-dominated in the decades that followed. But with it all, the Jews exhibit a sense of the insecurity of this usurpation of power. It does not belong to those who have seized it; it does not belong either by right of numbers, or by right of superior ability, or yet by right of a better use made of that power. They have taken power in America by audacity; they have taken it in such a way as to make resentment of it seem like an anti-racial movement - and that is why they have held it as long as they have. That is the only way to explain the meekness of the Americans in this matter, and it also accounts for the sense of insecurity which even the Jews feel in the position they hold. The American is the slowest person in the world to act on any line that savors of racial or religious prejudice. This makes for a seeming aloofness from matters like the Jewish Question. This also leads uninformed public men to sign protests against. "anti-semitism" which are really designed to be protests against the publication of Jewish facts. The foundation, organization and rapid success of the Kehillah in New York is an object lesson set in the sight of the world, as to what the Jew can do and will do when he exalts himself to the seat of rule.

As to the Kehillah being officially representative, it may be added that the Kehillah has in it representatives of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, Eastern Council of Reform Rabbis, Independent Order of B'nai B'rith, Independent Order of B'rith Shalom, Independent Order of Free Sons of Israel, Independent Order of B'rith Abraham, Federation of American Zionists - orthodox Jews, reform Jews, "apostate Jews," rich Jews, poor Jews, law-abiding Jews and red revolutionary Jews. At the 1918 Convention there were present: Jacob H. Schiff, banker; Louis Marshall, lawyer, president of the American Jewish Committee; Adolf S. Ochs, proprietor of the "New York Times"; Otto A. Rosalsky, judge of the General Sessions Court; Otto H. Kahn, of the banking house of Kuhn, Loeb and Company - AND -- Benjamin Schlesinger, who had lately returned from Moscow where he had a conference with Lenin; Joseph Schlossberg, general secretary of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America; Marc Pine, also a recent consultant with the Bolshevik rulers of Russia; David Pinski; Joseph Barondess, labor leader. The high and the low were there; the first world war was closing, the Russian revolution had been won. Judge Mack, who headed the War Risk Insurance Bureau of the United States Government, and the little leader of the reddest group in the East End - they all met in the Kehillah, as Jews. Adolph Ochs of the great "New York Times" together with the most feverish scribbler on a Yiddish weekly that calls for blood and violence, all of them of all classes, bound together in a solidarity which has been achieved by no other people so perfectly as by Judah. Banded together for the purpose of "protecting Jewish rights."*


What rights have Americans that Jews in America do not possess? Against whom are the Jews organized and against what? What basis is there for the cry of "persecution"? None whatever, except the Jews' own consciousness that the course they are pursuing is due for a check. The Jews always know that. They are not in the stream of the world, and every little while the world finds out what Judah always knows. The program of the Kehillah was ostensibly to "assert Jewish rights." No Jewish rights have ever been interfered with in America. The expression was a euphemism for a campaign to interfere with non-Jewish rights.

The New York Kehillah is the pattern and parent Jewish community in the United States, the visible entourage of the Jewish government, the dynamo which motivates those "protests" and "mass meetings" which are frequently heralded throughout the country, and the arsenal of that kind of dark power which the Jewish leaders know so well how to use. It is the "whispering gallery," where the famous whispering drives are originated and set in motion and made to break in lying publicity over the country. The liaison between this center of Jewish power and the affairs of the people of the United States is made by the American Jewish Committee. The Committee and the Kehillah are practically identical as far as the national Jewish program is concerned. Through their foreign associations they are also identical as far as the world program is concerned.

The United States is divided into 12 parts by the American Jewish Committee and every State belongs to a district headed by the most powerful and representative Jews. The Committee represents the focusing point of the religious, racial, financial and political will of Jewry. It is also the executive committee of the New York Kehillah. New York Jewry is the dynamo of the national Jewish machinery. Its national instrument is the American Jewish Committee. Among its direct leaders and supporters today are the owners of powerful newspapers, officials in Federal, State and City administration, influential office holders on public boards and corporations, members of the judiciary and police departments, financiers and heads of banking houses, mercantile and manufacturing establishments, labor leaders and political party organizers of all colors.

There are certain announced purposes of these associations, and there are certain purposes which are not announced. The announced purposes may be read in printed pages; the purposes not announced may be read in the records of attempted acts and achieved results. To keep the record straight let us look first at the announced purposes of the American Jewish Committee, then of the Kehillah; next at the line which binds the two together; and then at the real purposes as they are to be construed from a long list of attempts and achievements. The American Jewish Committee, officially organized in 1906, announced itself as incorporated for the following purposes:

• To prevent the infraction of the civil and religious rights of the Jews in any part of the world.

• To render all lawful assistance and to take appropriate remedial action in the event of threatened or actual invasion or restriction of such rights, or of unfavorable discrimination with respect thereto.

• To secure for Jews equality of economic, social and educational opportunities.

• To alleviate the consequences of persecution wherever they may occur, and to afford relief from calamities affecting the Jews.

It is an exclusively Jewish program. The Charter of the Kehillah empowered it, among other things, to establish an educational bureau, to adjust differences between Jewish residents or organizations by arbitration or by means of boards of mediation or conciliation; while the Constitution announces the purpose to be:

"To further the cause of Judaism in New York City and to represent the Jews in this city with respect to all local matters of Jewish interest."

Where the American Jewish Committee and the Kehillah join forces is shown as follows:

• Committee was a national organization, the Jewish Community (Kehillah), of New York City, if combined with it, would have a voice in shaping the policy of Jewry throughout the land. It is expressly understood that the American Jewish Committee shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all questions of a national or International character affecting the Jews generally."

It will be seen, therefore, that the Kehillah and the American Jewish Committee are one. The capital of the United States, in Jewish affairs, is New York. Perhaps that may throw a sidelight on the efforts which are constantly made to exalt New York as the spring and source of all the thoughts of the day. (Editor's Note: and now the seat of the United Nations system of world government)! New York, the Jewish capital of the United States, has been made the financial center, the art center, the political center of the country. But its art is oriental sensuousness, its politics those of a Judaized Tammany. It is the home of anti-American propaganda, of pro-Jewish hysteria, a mad confusion of mind that now passes all over the world as the true picture of America.

The doctrine with which so large a mass as the citizens of America have been inoculated is making havoc with the whole American program today. It is "broadening" America out of all semblance to its distinctive self and blurring out of recognition those determining ideals and ideas on which American institutions were based.


This study of the Jewish Question in the United States is not based upon religious differences. The religious element does not enter except when it is injected by the Jews themselves; they persistently inject it in three ways: First, in their allegation that any study of the Jews is "religious persecution"; second, by their own records of what their activities in the United States consist of; third, by the impression which is very misleading if not corrected, that the Jews are the Old Testament people. The Jews are not the Old Testament people and the Old Testament can be found among them only with difficulty. They are a Talmudical people who have preferred the volumes of rabbinical speculation to the words of the ancient prophets.

In this series of articles we have set aside every non-Jewish statement on this religious question, and have accepted only that which proceeds from recognized Jewish sources. It has been most illuminating, in studying the proceedings of the New York Kehillah and the American Jewish Committee, and their affiliated organizations, as represented by their activities throughout the country, to find how large a part of these activities have a religious bearing, as being directly and combatively anti-Christian.

That is to say, when the Jews set forth in the public charters and constitutions of their organizations that their only purpose is to "protect Jewish rights," and when the public asks what are these "Jewish rights" which need protection in this free country, the answer can be found only in the actions which the Jews take to secure that "protection."

Thus interpreted, "Jewish rights" seem to be summed up in the "right" to banish everything from their sight and hearing that suggests Christianity or its Founder. It is just there, from the Jewish side, that religious intolerance makes its appearance.

[End of Henry Ford Transcript]

One may be suspect of Ford’s motivations but one cannot deny historical facts. This scares the hell of Abe Foxman and those like him that are unable to adequately censor the internet to their own bigoted satisfaction.
Watcher in the woods
User avatar
Ahreeman X
General 5 Star
General 5 Star
Posts: 1414
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 1:54 pm
Location: San Diego, CA, USA

Iran Politics Club Review by Jack Holland

Postby CR » Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:15 pm

Iran Politics Club Review by Jack Holland

* Iran Politics club Review
* Interview with Ahreeman X

Here is a piece form a chapter (Iran Politics Club Chapter) of Jack Holland’s new and upcoming book about the Middle East:

Iran Politics Club Review by Jack Holland
A day you haven't learned a new, is a day lost!
User avatar
Chief Warrant Officer 4
Chief Warrant Officer 4
Posts: 705
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:57 am
Location: Between Morocco & USA

Return to United States of America Room

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests