Moderators: Club Operations, Web Operations, Political Operations
"3- I already have Liberator’s vote, since he known that I am the only solid supporter of Shah, omitting that small things on Reza Shah, Savak, and Kurdish Cola issues."
2. Isn’t it vividly laminating that both members are SHAHI’s, void of the Spirit of Freedom which is bestowed upon all Free Men, as reflected through the Spirit and the Substance of The Constitution of The U.S.A. and the Amendments.
3. Isn’t it vividly illuminating that Intolerance laminates the cornerstone of the Ideologies and Philosophies of the above Discredited, whoes ways and traditions render mass conformity and compliance a code. And, divergence from such code will descend the penalty of Capital Punishment or, shall we say, physical teleportation of the accused to absentia, complements of SAVAK. And, in accordance to their agenda, all shall submissively bend over and accommodate a handful few Royals, or else ! Have U been marked Non-Royal, yet?
Is there any one that you haven’t referred to in the context of Savak and apparently being proponent of Shah you yield no coherence, since Shah without the Savak is like a donkey without a poop. Your plead for attention is moot, attempt to sell your dark hairy complexion fruitless, and endeavor to secure a mate, hollow. Perhaps, U should try the local Zoo. Try the grate apes section.
Fellow Iranians,
i. Many of U lived under the Shah when U dared not to express your true Political and Ideological inclinations. U dared NOT to free express because U feared SAVAK and being given the fredom to choose between CokaCola, PepsiCola, or Osso.
ii. U shut your mouth observant of the fact that Iran during the Shah was a big Ass Kissing Fraternity sustained by grand Oil Revenues that were disappearing in the big pockets of the Royal Family.
iii. U shut your mouth, as the underclass was organizing covertly, as your rights of free political expression was no granter that Iranian Sheep!
iv. U shut your mouth because of Discredited, Special Interest, snd Asskissing Gutless Entities incapable of personal sacrifice, such as this Liberator who had the dignity to grab balls and run at the first inkling of a problem, leaving principals and beliefs in the outhouse, allowing the others to make the sacrifices.
v. And now, the Discredited Liberator exercises that which is in his nature, an urge to gag, suppress, and expunge that which is not aligned with his Historically Failed Agenda and Ways.
vi. If U submit to the will of the Contemptible Discredited, then it will be not a matter of if, but when U will be suppressed.
3- Your special motives and interests are fully understandable. U are an 9-5 nobody in US and your high hope remains that Shah will get resurrected and U will be back to your Savak business with pride. Yet the reality is that the era of Kingdoms is gone. The ones that are still harmoniously in existence are Symbolic Monarchies (like UK, Fenland, Norway, etc). The ones that are true Monarchies (Saudi Arabia, Koveyt, etc) are sliding on a foundation oil revenues, excluding counties like Jordan which are founded on serving US interest.
prologicam wrote:My name is Camran, not Cameron.
prologicam wrote:That is not the case, Kooni was a monarchist at heart when he joined IPC until, from his point of view, he realized it was a mistake to be a monarchist. He couldn't figure out the monarchist standing views. In one hand the Shah was tough but quiet gay to stand down and give up his kingdom with a blow of a wind. As his statement I reminded you of, he originally was a pro Akbar Pahlavi II, then he become disenchanted by all the controversy surrounded the Akbar Aqa II. He gained the experience from sticking around in IPC for as long as he could, while measuring and assessing everyone's political stands, then he gave up what he thought it was his belief.
Shah bent over like a tow cents note. His son is waiting in dress......, for you...., me......,or others to help him to win back the throne?
The fact is; Everybody, whether by the old book or the new book, will pay a penalty for their mistakes. One element in making a mistake is to delay action, for that reason alone if you like, it does not permit him to progress in the same direction any more, in another words it is too late for him to mown and grown and cry out for victory, it is as simple as that. If you disagree, then you explain what does a "bad loser" mean?
We used to say; When a train leaves the station, it is not coming back for you to get on it. Why doesn't he want to accept the fact that he missed his train.
Regards
Camran
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests