of Shiite Mahdi - Review on Imam Zaman
Mahdi after reappearance!
A review on
The Myth of Shi'a (Shiite) Mahdi
by Abu Muhammad Al-Afriqi
The Myth of Shi'a (Shiite) Mahdi
Yes folks, this is about the emaam Zamaan the valiyeh asr, the
hidden Imam of KIRAN.
The Myth of
the Shiit Mahdi.
Growing up in
Iran, I knew a lot of pee-poles being called mehdi ,
but never Mahdi ; but after 78 some idiot Miranians called their
sons Mahdi !
But that was
only in the very early days, soon even many such fathers
escaped to Khaarej, thinking " cheh gohi khordim !" ,
but never dared to say
it aloud so others would hear it.
Who is this Mahdi whose return to this world is so eagerly awaited
the Shi'ah, and belief in whose existence in occultation forms such
integral aspect of the Shi'i psyche?
Let's find out.
The cornerstone of the Shi'i faith is the belief that the spiritual
leadership of this Ummah after the demise of Rasulullah is vested
in the Imam,
who is appointed, like the Nabi himself, by Allah, and who enjoys
distinctions and privileges of the Nabi .
This can only
be pure MULLshit!
No, God, who decided to stop sending more Prophets, will NOT
send DIVINE Imams not only immediately, but at the same time of
the last Prophet! If Imams were divine, then Ali must've been
divine, so he must've been borne divine, like the rest of them.
But this can not be, coz when Ali was borne, the Prophet was not
chosen yet. So Y choose a Prophet when a DIVINE Imam lives?!
Same thing goes
for Hasan/Hoseyn : God will not send divine Imams,
when the LAST Prophet was alive!
But this is
not true, Imams r supposed to be more than Nabi!
The MULLshit says that the Imam's piss was shafaa/medicine!
However, they believe that Imamah, unlike Nubuwwah, can never
come to an end. In this regard there is a well-known Shi'i hadith
says that "the world cannot exist without an Imam", and
goes that "if the earth were to be without an Imam for a single
Now this is
classic MULLshit of best kind: putting words in the mouth
of GOD! Surely if this were true, God would've said it in Qoran,
being trained by Mullahs to be brain-dead, never bothered
to ask questions, they just accepted MULLshit as holy! And if any
to question it, like Kasravi did, KK Mullahs would have him killed.
Thus, when it came to pass that the first of those whom they regard
their Imams- Sayyiduna Ali radiyallahu 'anhu- left this world, a
problem arose. Some of those who regarded themselves as his followers
claimed that he did not in fact die, but that he will return to
Others said that he was succeeded as Imam by his son Hasan, who
turn succeeded by his brother Husayn.
folks, many people at that time were Christian/Jews, so the
concept of not-really-being-dead was well known then!
When Husayn died there were some who claimed to follow their other
brother Muhammad (known as Ibn al-Hanafiyyah) as their Imam. When
he died his followers claimed that he was in reality alive, and
that he will
return in due time. Others amongst the Shi'ah took Sayyiduna Husayn's
Ali, surnamed Zayn al-'Abidin, as their Imam, and upon his death
their loyalties to his son, Muhammad al-Baqir.
al-Baqir died there were once again elements from amongst the Shi'ah
who denied his death and claimed that he would return one day, while
took his son Ja'far as-Sadiq as their Imam.
he died there was mass confusion amongst the Shi'ah: each of his
Isma'il, Abdullah, Muhammad, Zakariyya, Ishaq and Musa was claimed
various groups amongst the Shi'ah to be their Imam. In addition
to them there
was a group who believed that Ja'far did not really die, and that
return one day.
or less the same thing happened at the death of his son Musa. Some
the Shi'ah denied his death, believing that he will return, and
to take as their new Imam one of his sons. Some of these chose his
while others chose his other son Ali ar-Rida.
him they took as their Imam his son Muhammad al-Jawwad (or at-Taqi),
and after him his son Ali al-Hadi (or an-Naqi). At the death of
Ali al-Hadi they
looked upon his son Hasan al-Askari as their new- and 11th- Imam.
Wow, as the
torks would say 'pokh yedi Dynasty or days of our lives'!
Meaning Dynasty pales to insignificance compared to this soap opera!
folks, in them days there was no cameras, no tape recorders &
not many who could read or write, so the F*ing Mullahs were Kings
they said was believed by their gaav/olaaq followers. V may well
say : not much
The death of Hasan al-Askari
have now arrived at the year 254 AH, the time when a major section
Shi'ah accepted as their Imam the 22-year old Hasan, son of Ali
10th lineal descendant of Sayyiduna Ali and Sayyidah Fatimah radiyallahu
'anhuma. Six years later, in 260 AH, Hasan al-Askari, at the very
of 28, is lying on his deathbed, but unlike any of his forefathers
he leaves no
offspring, no one to whom the Shi'ah might appropriate as their
aay geryah kunid
Don't worry, KK Mullahs will save the day!
The Shi'ah who had been regarding Hasan al-Askari as their Imam
thrown into mass disarray. Does this mean the end of the Imamah?
end of the Imamah would mean the end of Shi'ism. Were they prepared
confusion that reigned amongst the Shi'ah after the death of Hasan
al-Askari is reflected by the Shi'i writer Hasan ibn Musa an-Nawbakhti,
who counts the emergence of altogether 14 sects amongst the followers
Hasan al-Askari, each one with a different view on the future of
and the identity of the next Imam.
must be noted that an-Nawbakhti was alive at the time all of this
place. Another Shi'i writer, Sa'd ibn Abdullah al-Qummi, who also
the same time, counts 15 sects, and a century later the historian
enumerates altogether 20 separate sects.
Wow, 20 sects!
They must have been very divided, almost like Miranians r today!
There were four major trends amongst these
- There were those who accepted the death of Hasan al-Askari as
a fact, and
accepted also the fact that he left no offspring. To them Imamah
had thus come to
an end, just like Nubuwwah came to an end with the death of Rasulullah
r . However,
there were some amongst them who kept hoping for the advent of a
- The second trend was one to which the student of the history of
to the Imamah" would be much more used to. This was the tendency
to deny the
death of Hasan al-Askari, and to claim that he would return in the
future to establish
justice upon earth. We have seen this tendency emerge amongst the
Shi'ah at more
than one critical juncture in the history of the Imamah of the Shi'ah;
it is therefore
only logical to expect it to resurface at a moment as critical as
the death of Hasan
- The third trend was to extend the chain of Imamah to Hasan's brother
- The fourth trend was the claim that Hasan al-Askari did in fact
have a son.
It is the fourth trend which ultimately became the view of the dominant
And of course
the SHIIT being totally anti-logic, never even bothered to ask
"Y didn't God say anything about all this in Qoran?"
"Y would God send holy Imams after the LAST Prophet? One after
the other till the
end of time?!"
"Y would DIVINE Imams go to toilet & eat & have sex
& die like other humans?"
The missing son
trend was spearheaded by persons who had set themselves up as the
representatives of the Imam, and who were in control of a network
various parts of the Islamic empire- a network for the purpose of
money in the name of the Imams of the Ahl al-Bayt.
Now we can see
the genius of KK Mullahs & their GREED!
All followers of the Imams were obliged to pay one fifth of their
income to the
representatives of the Imams. (This is a practice which continues
up to today.)
At the head of this network was a man called Uthman ibn Sa'id al-'Amri.
manner of resolving the predicament was unique: Hasan al-Askari
was dead, he
admitted, but he was not childless. He had a 4-year old son, Muhammad,
whom no one but he- Uthman ibn Sa'id- could have contact. And from
point onwards he would act as the representative (wakeel) of the
and collect money in his name.
Well if pee-pole
r so stupid to believe this shit, then y not take advantage of them?!
To the fact that Hasan al-Askari's own family
were completely ignorant of
the existence of any child of his, and that his estate had been
his brother Ja'far and his mother, Uthman ibn Sa'id and his ilk
denouncing Ja'far as al-Kadhdhab (the Liar).
Use Tohmat !
I'm sure he must've used a lot of Fohsh too!
He must've branded them as kaafar too (bi din) & taaquti !
K* Keshy of Mullahs goes way back!
I wonder what would they have done if TOHMAT was halaal in Islam?!
In due time a fantastic story was brought into circulation about
between Hasan al-Askari and a Roman slave-girl, who is variously
as Narjis, Sawsan or Mulaykah. She is mentioned as having been the
of Yusha' (Joshua), the Roman emperor, who is a direct descendant
apostle Simon Peter. But history shows that there never was a Roman
of that name. The Roman emperor of the time was Basil I, and neither
any other emperor is known to have descended from Peter. The story
to tell of her capture by the Muslim army, how she eventually came
to be sold
to Hasan al-Askari, and of her supernatural pregnancy and the secret
birth of the
son of whom no one- aside from Uthman ibn Sa'id and his clique-
anything. Everything about the child is enveloped in a thick and
cloud of mystery.
the ultimate tool of K* Keshy: LIES & fabrication!
Same kind of things were said about Daughter of Persian King marrying
Uthman ibn Sa'id remained the "representative of the Hidden
Imam" for a
number of years. In all that time he was the only link the Shi'ah
had with their
Imam. During that time he supplied the Shi'i community with tawqi'at,
written communications, which he claimed was written to them by
Imam. Many of these communications, which are still preserved in
at-Tusi's Kitab al-Ghaybah, had to do with denouncing other claimants
position of representatives, who had come to realise exactly how
position Uthman ibn Sa'id had created for himself. The Shi'i literature
with Uthman ibn Sa'id's tenure as representative is replete with
money collected from the Shi'i public.
all those who say bad things about him should be stoned!
(Well those who believed him must've been 'stoned' too (on drugs)!
When Uthman ibn Sa'id died, his son Abu Ja'far Muhammad produced
written communication from the Hidden Imam in which he himself is
appointed the second representative, a position which he held for
of gaav/olaaq pee-pole then neither!
SHIIT seems to thrive only with gaav/olaaq.
He too, like his father, had to deal with several rival claimants
to his position,
but the tawqi'at which he regularly produced to denounce them and
his own position ensured the removal of such obstacles and the continuation
of support from a credulous Shi'i public.
Yes indeed 'Rivals'!
Have u seen how Mullahs look at each other: pure KINEH, with a cold
he too had to deal with rival claimants, one of whom, Muhammad ibn
ash-Shalmaghani used to be an accomplice of his. He is reported
Ja'far at-Tusi's book Kitab al-Ghaybah as having stated: "We
what we were into with Abul Qasim ibn Rawh. We used to fight like
this matter (of being representative)."
Wow, an honest
Mullah? Can't be, impossible!
When Abul Qasim an-Nawbakhti died in 326 AH he bequethed the position
representative to Abul Hasan as-Samarri. Where the first three representatives
were shrewd manipulators, Abul Hasan as-Samarri proved to be a more
conscientous person. During his three years as representative there
was a sudden
drop in tawqi'at. Upon his deathbed he was asked who his successor
would be, and
answered that Allah would Himself fulfil the matter. Could this
perhaps be seen as
a refusal on his part to perpetuate a hoax that has gone on for
too long? He also
produced a tawqi' in which the Imam declares that from that day
till the day of his
reappearance he will never again be seen, and that anyone who claims
him in that time is a liar.
Too easy, anytime
u want something, just issue fatvaa & the gaav/olaaq will follow.
Thus, after more or less 70 years, the last "door of contact"
with the Hidden
Imam closed. The Shi'ah term this period, in which there was contact
their Hidden Imam through his representatives-cum-tax-collectors,
Occultation (al-Ghaybah as-Sughra), and the period from the death
of the last
representative onwards the Greater Occultation (al-Ghaybah al-Kubar).
Greater Occultation has already continued for over a thousand years.
of the representatives
one reads the classical literature of the Shi'ah in which the activities
of the four representatives are outlined, one is struck by the constantly
theme of money. They are almost always mentioned in connection with
and collecting "the Imam's money" his loyal Shi'i followers.
There is a shocking
lack of any activities of an academic or spiritual nature. Not a
single one of the
four is credited with having compiled any book, despite the fact
that they were in
exclusive communion with the last of the Imams, the sole repository
of the legacy
of Rasulullah sallallahu 'alayhi wasallam.
look for academic/spiritual nature!
Even KK Khomeini didn't have much of it, so many asshole 'educated'
bent over for him in 78!
When we look at the major sources upon which the Shi'i faith is
based, we find
that most of them were written after the onset of the Greater Occultation.
works, like al-Kafi, which was written during the latter decades
of the Lesser
Occultation, contain scarcely a reference to any of the four representatives
narrators from the Hidden Imam. Instead it is filled with thousands
which go back, via other channels, to the fifth and the sixth Imams.
indeed strange, considering the fact that a man like Uthman ibn
is claimed to have been closely associated with the 10th, the 11th
as well as the
hidden 12th Imam, and also the fact that his son remained the Shi'i
solitary link to that Imam for half a century. Would it not have
been better and
more authoritative for an author like al-Kulayni to report the hadith
of his Imams
from the Hidden Imam via his representatives who lived in Baghdad
at the same
time as he rather than to trace it all back to the fifth and sixth
Imams through a
myriad of doubtful channels?
of course, he could not have done that, because the activities of
representatives did not have as much to do with authentically preserving
legacy of the Ahl al-Bayt as with the collection of wealth in their
Well v don't
want to make the LIES too obvious, lest some of the gaav/olaaq
start questioning things, do we?!
But there is
a limit to how much shit u can sweep under the carpet, eventually
the stink will make somebody lift the carpet & then the shit
will hit the fan!
In light of the fact that the Shi'ah explain the necessity of Imamah
of the need for an infallible guide who serves as the repository
of the legacy
of Ahl al-Bayt, it appears extremely incongruous that this particular
left no sort of legacy of his own whereby the legacy of the Ahl
al-Bayt can be
known. Despite the fact that an infallible guide supposedly exists,
it is upon
fallible persons such as Muhammad ibn Ya'qub al-Kulayni that the
must depend for that legacy.
The only bit of information that has come down to us regarding the
Imam's authentication of the hadith legacy of the Shi'ah is what
by Aqa Muhammad Baqir Khwansari in his book Rawdat al-Jannat. He
that al-Kulayni's book was presented to the Hidden Imam who looked
at it and
declared, "Hadha Kaafin li-Shi'atina" (This is enough
for our Shi'ah). This is
incidentally how the book received its name.
Who is the authority here GOD or some phony 'hidden' guy invented
crook? If GOD wanted Imams, he'd have mentioned them in Qoran!
A report such as this creates a huge problem. It appears to be a
the contents of the book al-Kafi by the infallible Imam. Yet, 9
the Shi'i muhaddith, Mulla Muhammad Baqir Majlisi, would declare
commentary on al-Kafi, named Mir'at al-'Uqul, that 9,485 out of
narrations in al-Kafi are unreliable. What did Majlisi know that
Imam was so unaware of that he would authenticate a book, 60% of
contents would later be discovered to be unreliable?
Wow! So much
shit that even SHIIT leaders had to stop some if it!
This is shit going out of control!
The Iraqi Shi'i scholar, Muhammad Baqir as-Sadr, finds proof for
existence of the Hidden Mahdi in what he calls "the experience
community". The existence of the Hidden Imam, he postulates,
experienced by the Shi'i community as a whole in the written
communications that the representatives used supplied them with.
U mean the community
of millions of gaav/olaaq, totally brain washed
by asshole Mullahs?!
The crux of this argument lies in the fact that an individual experience
might be doubted, but never that of experience of an entire community.
However, the glaring flaw in this line of reasoning is that it very
overlooks the part of the representatives as the individual go-betweens.
gaav/olaaq 'saw' the ugly ass of KK Khomeini on the moon,
so it must be true? No, this was pure MULLshit in the hands of gaav/olaaq!
The community never had the privilege of seeing or meeting the person
they believed to be the author of the tawqi'at. Their experience
to receiving what the representatives produced. Even the argument
consistent handwriting in all the various tawqi'at is at best melancholy.
There is no way one can get away from the fact that the existence
Hidden Imam rests upon nothing other than acceptance of the words
activities of those representatives furthermore go a long way to
that they were much, much more inspired by the desire to possess
pious sentiments of any kind.
This is what the filthy Mullahs proved in KIRAN beyond any doubt!
They r greedy power hungry zaalem binaamus bivojdaan qaatel animal
So when the Shi'ah commemorate the birth of their twelfth Imam on
15th night of Sha'ban, or when they seek to apply a hadith in Sunni
which speak of twelve khalifas to their twelve Imams, then let us
on what basis do they accept the existence of the twelfth one?
Yes, v may ask,
but brain-dead pee-poles who follow Shiit can't answer.
And nothing a filthy mullah would say could be true!
History bears witness to the existence of eleven persons in that
line of descent, but when we come to the twelfth one, all we have
made by persons whose activities in the name of their Hidden Imam
us all the reason in the world to suspect their honesty and integrity.
Bravo, 11 'persons'
not holy DIVINE Imam, whose piss was shafaa!
In Islam, issues of faith can never be based upon evidence of this
GOD didn't give humans a BRAIN so that they could sit on it!
vaay vaay jish zadim ,
mollaaro aatish zadim!
* * *